Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Jon Schindehette writes about standing out

Art director Jon Schindehette wrote this about the current concept and fantasy art scene:

So often when I attend a convention and wade through hundreds of portfolios in a weekend, I am struck by the “sameness” of them all. So many folks have the same look, the same style, the same mark making techniques. It’s almost as if there is this fantasy/sci-fi Photoshop filter running around the internet. < . . . > At the end of a long and tiring con, do you think I remember the one guy that excelled at the predominate style? Maybe. But I can guarantee that I remember the folks that stood out from the crowd – the amazing gouache artist, the stellar water-color artist, the person that was doing something in Photoshop that I had never seen before. Nope, I didn’t really remember anyone that had applied the SFS Filter to their work. They just didn’t stand out.

It's true for any art scene from any age.  Many people copy, but few people dare to invent. For every Rembrandt or Vermeer, there are a thousand Dutch painters who were producing the same run-of-the mill stuff. It's just that we get to see everything that is in vogue today, but to see those Dutch run-of-the-mill products you have to go to third-tier museums that cannot afford Rembrandt. The same will eventually happen to the artists of our times.

The full article link:  http://theartorder.com/2011/08/26/differentiate-or-die/

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Giving retired cells the boot

It turns out that a big part of the condition associated with old age is due to accumulation of the "ballast" cells at the end of their useful life. The immune system does remove them, but not quickly enough, so the longer you live, the more of those you keep. They secrete various chemicals and impede the function of your organs.

Now someone has shown a relatively simple way to get rid of them (in mice), and the results are interesting. Treated mice don't live longer, but their tissues stay younger.

The blogs are buzzing about this piece of research today. The claims, understandably, have gone a bit wild. Here is an article that provides some perspective:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/notrocketscience/2011/11/02/extending-healthy-life-by-getting-rid-of-retired-cells

In short, a treatment like this won't make you live longer as many seem to claim, but it will make you stay in better shape longer and let you get more out of your years. Which is a big deal, so all the people who dismiss it as "irrelevant" are missing the point.

I hope this gets out of lab and into human tests soon.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Art Picks: Wind


The Wind by kamui (I have no other info on this artist)


What makes this picture work
Great bold composition and smart use of the medium.
The diagonal composition always looks dynamic, but here it is enhanced by the arrogant frame cropping and making the top half of the canvas the focus. The leaping sphinx is almost (the key point is, almost) too big for the frame, which reminds the viewer of a lucky snapshot photograph, further enhancing the dynamic effect. The two parrots help fill the space, as well as create and enhance secondary lines of action, "pulling" the sphinx along.
The lower half is filled with silhouetted trees, which underscore the height of the sphinx's leap and balance the composition without distracting the viewer's attention. Skillful use of texture and brushstroke is remarkable; they enhance the points of interest but never become a point to show off. The hair is lushly textured, but the spots are sketchy and don't distract from the feline body form. The front parrot is detailed, but the back one is subdued and sketchy. The trees are actually a posterized photo, but the collage technique is used so subtly and altered by hand, you would never realize that. Everything is used in moderation. Even the color is subdued and neutral to bring out the gold in the sphinx.

Incidentally, the sphinx is clearly a close relative to the one in Khnopff's Caress. It's good to see cultural allusions like this.

What could be improved
Cohesion could be better in some places. The artist clearly used photographs here, and used them well, but if you look at the way the head is attached to the neck, you could see that the forms and anatomical structures do not quite mesh believably. A part of it is the angle of the head, turned towards the viewer rather than forward. That might have been an artistic decision or limited by available photograph. But in either case the artist should have thought of where the muscles attach, rather than follow the reference to the letter.

Like this? Follow my blog for more Art Picks, or Like it on Facebook!

Friday, October 14, 2011

Pre-next con: iCON

There is an exhibition of my works at iCON in Tel Aviv's Eshkol Pais building, starting Sunday. If you are in the area, drop by.

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Who watches the supermen


It might seem at the first glance that the protagonist of Alan Moore's Watchmen is Dr. Manhattan, and the book's focus is exploration of what it would truly mean to be superhuman. If you look deeper, it is not quite so.

True, a great deal of the book focuses on Dr. Manhattan's origin story, current situation and growing awareness of his detachment from humanity that culminates in him leaving Earth in the end. However, there are two other characters who get nearly as much attention, and more history. They do not pain themselves over their loss of humanity like Dr. Osterman or manipulate the world like Veidt, react to Kovacs's story like Dr. Long or provide a human outlook on the events like Dreiberg, Juspeczyk and the two Bernards. These two merely frame and underlie the whole story as we see it.

Both of them are monsters.

There is more than one way to be a monster, though, and these two are as different as two psychopaths can be.

The Comedian is the extremely human monster, uninhibited, amoral, murderous, lecherous, a troglodyte with heavy weapons. He has no principles, only impulses and cunning; he is not even an anarchist, and sells out to the government so he can continue the debauchery with an official blessing. It seems that there is nothing too heinous for him to do; when the retired heroes assembled for his funeral remember his presence in their lives, they remember him raping, killing, destroying, cynically abusing everyone. His impulsive depravity hits the truly monstrous bottom when he shoots a woman pregnant with his own child without regret. And yet there are people who were his friends and mourned him.


Rorschach is the polar opposite, cold, calculating, preternaturally focused, the only feeling he cultivates is the fanatical feeling of justice. He has no impulses, only intellect and principles to uphold which he stops at nothing; Rorschach is a survivor, rather than an aggressor, but to ensure his survival and enforce his principles he commits atrocities and disregards anyone else's well-being... for as long as it serves his goals, then he simply walks away.  Ultimately, his principles prove to have priority over his own survival. He had honed himself into a ruthless, efficient avenging entity, becoming almost inhuman. He's as amoral and cruel as the Comedian, except rather than simply disregarding the social convention, he follows a moral of his own design which is incompatible with anyone else's. And yet there are people who were his friends and mourned him, too.

The two human monsters, one sunk to the monstrous state by following his impulses, the other elevated to the same monstrous state by following his ideals, are the two extremes of human condition in the book. Every character has a little of the Comedian in them. Every character has a little of Rorschach in them. The Rorschach-like detachment of Dr. Manhattan mingles with things he did in Vietnam on the Comedian's side. Ozymandias's Rorschach-like idealism pushes him to calculate odds at which killing millions to save billions becomes acceptable, but like the Comedian, he destroys witnesses in mass murder and kills people with his own hands. We all have potential to become the Comedian. We all have potential to become Rorschach.

The Comedian dies when he discovers the true cynical monstrousness of organized atrocity that even his decades-cultivated cynicism could not bear, and it finally breaks him like any human who saw too much injustice. Rorschach dies when he puts his principle of justice and truth above his own survival, refusing to lie even to save himself and tell the truth later, like any human who would rather die than face a lifetime of knowing they betrayed their ideals even for an instant.Their pursuits of debauchery and ideal, running in the opposite directions, still brought them together in death. The two monsters die human deaths, never having escaped the humanity that caught up with them in the end.

Their symmetrical deaths, the Comedian's at the beginning and Rorschach's at the end, frame the book and the human perspective on what it means to try to be superhuman.

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Bill Watterson: early comics



College comics by Bill Watterson, pre-Calvin-and-Hobbes. Take a look.

And here is a whole bundle of Watterson's early work.

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Outfoxed


Clothes may not make a man, but they can make a fox something else in online comic Outfoxed by Dylan Meconis.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Next con: NecronomiCon 2011 in Florida.
Not attending in person, but I got art in the art show, so if you are there, come see!

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Sketches: Ceci n'est pas une femme


A practice sketch. Fooling around with suggesting things using wrong kinds of objects. (Also drawing robots and tipping my nonexistent hat to Magritte.)

The face of this robot is not really a face; it is just some eyes and lips painted on its blank faceplate. Creepy, isn't it?

Also here: http://chiseledrocks.com/main/galleries/sketches/topics/notawoman

Saturday, September 17, 2011

Art Picks: Big Bad Bunny Eater


"Big Bad Bunny Eater" by Bobby Chiu (imaginism)

What makes this picture work
This picture is a great example of intelligent humor.

Mimicry like this actually occurs in nature. The sort where the whole creature imitates another whole creature is more frequent, but creatures with "drawings" or "sculptures" made of a part of their body do exist. So we have believability; but the picture's real impact is hilarity. The realistic handling of textures and lighting gets combined with extremely stylized bunnies. Whimsical but entirely plausible details like the monster's fur mimicking a patch of grass or its ears getting co-opted into representing the fake "bunny"'s ones are next to the comically evil expression on its face. And then there is the whole premise of a huge monster pretending to be something tiny.

If the bunnies were realistic, we wouldn't believe that they could be fooled by the Eater's disguise. But if the whole picture were stylized, we wouldn't really see how bad the disguise really is. It's a perfect case of the realistic finish and well-grounded tidbits adding a lot of credibility to a very unrealistic and far-fetched situation, but it also makes the combination a major source of the humor, and that is rare.

What could be improved
The fur texture on the Eater's tail is a bit mechanical, and the regular clumping on it is out of place; I'd expect such clumping to happen under the throat or some other place where skin gets a lot of stretching.The greens could use more variety. The leaves on the forest floor are so bright that they suggest autumn, but all leaves still on the trees are green, and the vegetation seems tropical. All these things are technicalities and do not really detract anything big from the picture, though.



Like this? Follow my blog for more Art Picks, or Like it on Facebook!

Thursday, September 8, 2011

The Dark Art of Pricing

In a very rare example of a professional illustrator explaining the pricing process, Jessica Hische, who gave us shouldiworkforfree.com, discusses The Dark Art of Pricing.

She explains why the hourly rate pricing can be detrimental, and discusses pricing for lease of rights (something which, in my experience, a lot of smaller employers aren't versed in — not just illustrators.) She also gives a compelling argument against speculative work, and mentions the "presentation only" pricing (which is another thing that smaller clients and illustrators often are unaware of).

Required reading for any up-and-coming freelance illustrator.

http://www.jessicahische.is/obsessedwiththeinternet/andhelpingyougetpaid/the-dark-art-of-pricing


Wednesday, September 7, 2011

“Tell it your way”

“What is that?” - “It’s a unicorn.” - “Never seen one up close before.” - “Beautiful.” - “Get away, get away!” - “I’m sorry.”

“Tell it your way” was a cinema contest in which the competitors were to make a short film using only the six lines of dialogue above.

Nothing else could say it better that cinema is so much more than just the story.

The winning film: